Technology & Engineering Due Diligence

Production capacity calculations, equipment performance parameters, process engineering assumptions, software and firmware capabilities, application architecture, development roadmaps, scalability claims, and technology readiness levels. Each claim in the audit's scope is verified against the underlying engineering artifact, not against the project's own marketing material.

Everything operates under mutual NDA. Source code, schematics, calculations, and proprietary documentation are reviewed in our access environment under the access agreement. Findings reference artifacts; the underlying artifacts are not redistributed.

When source-of-truth verification requires it, yes. The audit may include reverse engineering, technical documentation analysis, source code and binary assessment, production workflow evaluation, prototype inspection, and re-derivation of engineering calculations. Reverse engineering is a means to verify the audit's claims — not the deliverable in itself.

Yes. We accept due-diligence engagements only when we have no engineering or commercial position in the project being audited. The audit's value depends on independence; we are explicit about it in writing.

A structured audit-grade report under NDA. Executive summary for non-technical stakeholders, detailed findings for technical reviewers, and an evidence appendix referencing every claim back to the underlying artifact. The format is built for credit and investment committees, not for marketing reuse.

Pricing depends on the audit's scope, the artifact volume, and the depth of verification required. Most audits run between four and twelve weeks. Engagements start with a paid scoping phase that produces the access agreement and a fixed engagement letter.